Comments on: How Google Handles Duplicate Content http://kikolani.com/google-handles-duplicate-content.html Blog Marketing Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:48:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Why I Couldn’t Care Less About Content Theft http://kikolani.com/google-handles-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-72429 Why I Couldn’t Care Less About Content Theft Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:24:35 +0000 http://kikolani.com/?p=4928#comment-72429 [...] content he had written and posting it on their site. This is an issue I have come across and even written about before and I wanted to respond with my own guest post on this site to explain why I personally [...] [...] content he had written and posting it on their site. This is an issue I have come across and even written about before and I wanted to respond with my own guest post on this site to explain why I personally [...]

]]> By: Jason @ How to make lots of money fast http://kikolani.com/google-handles-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-64867 Jason @ How to make lots of money fast Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:39:46 +0000 http://kikolani.com/?p=4928#comment-64867 I think it's quite a good idea that Google is looking after this subject. The reason is many a time its the guys getting hooked off while they have created the content! It is time Google takes a deeper look into sites that makes a habit of it by getting 'non-unique' content from other places and make it their own. I think it’s quite a good idea that Google is looking after this subject. The reason is many a time its the guys getting hooked off while they have created the content!
It is time Google takes a deeper look into sites that makes a habit of it by getting ‘non-unique’ content from other places and make it their own.

]]> By: saptak mandal http://kikolani.com/google-handles-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-57448 saptak mandal Sat, 04 Sep 2010 09:09:50 +0000 http://kikolani.com/?p=4928#comment-57448 I don't think blog post dates works because as you know popular websites are crawled more and if a less popular websites publishes and their pages id not indexed yet ..then if a popular websites steals contents from that less popular website and get indexed .Google may think that less popular website steal content and used duplicate content. It not about the post date i think its about the date when the page was indexed. I don’t think blog post dates works because as you know popular websites are crawled more and if a less popular websites publishes and their pages id not indexed yet ..then if a popular websites steals contents from that less popular website and get indexed .Google may think that less popular website steal content and used duplicate content.

It not about the post date i think its about the date when the page was indexed.
saptak mandal recently posted..Complete SEO PackagesMy Profile

]]> By: Alex http://kikolani.com/google-handles-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-46140 Alex Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:18:49 +0000 http://kikolani.com/?p=4928#comment-46140 Good effort! I think the most important factor here is the website authority, the rank. Sites like technorati,CNET reviews will obviously not copy content from an ordinary blogs. Therefore Google should be able to distinguish between the original and duplicate one. Anyhow, I think Google should not index blogs with entirely copied content. Really this is discouraging bloggers to write original and quality content. Google should take it into consideration soon. Thats my message to Google.Thanks! Good effort! I think the most important factor here is the website authority, the rank. Sites like technorati,CNET reviews will obviously not copy content from an ordinary blogs. Therefore Google should be able to distinguish between the original and duplicate one. Anyhow, I think Google should not index blogs with entirely copied content. Really this is discouraging bloggers to write original and quality content. Google should take it into consideration soon. Thats my message to Google.Thanks!
Alex recently posted..Internet Security Software Comparison and ReviewsMy Profile

]]> By: Plus Size Woman http://kikolani.com/google-handles-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-45853 Plus Size Woman Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:02:11 +0000 http://kikolani.com/?p=4928#comment-45853 Great article. However it will become more and more difficult for the Search Engines and other bots to detect duplicate. The reason is, with article spinner software, one can take any interesting article and just substitute works and paragraphs with synonyms. The two documents, the original and the spun version, are actually the same in substance yet different in the "eyes" of search engines. Great article. However it will become more and more difficult for the Search Engines and other bots to detect duplicate. The reason is, with article spinner software, one can take any interesting article and just substitute works and paragraphs with synonyms. The two documents, the original and the spun version, are actually the same in substance yet different in the “eyes” of search engines.
Plus Size Woman recently posted..Tips To Getting That Profile Picture for Your Dating Site!My Profile

]]> By: Udegbunam Chukwudi | StrictlyOnlineBiz http://kikolani.com/google-handles-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-43785 Udegbunam Chukwudi | StrictlyOnlineBiz Wed, 12 May 2010 18:26:05 +0000 http://kikolani.com/?p=4928#comment-43785 Be wary of those sites cos they sometimes send you trackbacks et pingbacks as well. If you make the mistake of accepting these trackbacks, most of them turn around and remove your content from their blogs creating a one way link from your site to theirs. When Google sees this, it assumes you're linking to a bad neighborhood and then penalizes you. I've been a victim before :-( .-= New from Udegbunam Chukwudi | StrictlyOnlineBiz <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/StrictlyOnlineBiz/~3/OymzYqBzA7o/">Nigerians It’s Time We Forget About Paid Online Surveys</a> =-. Be wary of those sites cos they sometimes send you trackbacks et pingbacks as well. If you make the mistake of accepting these trackbacks, most of them turn around and remove your content from their blogs creating a one way link from your site to theirs. When Google sees this, it assumes you’re linking to a bad neighborhood and then penalizes you. I’ve been a victim before :-(
.-= New from Udegbunam Chukwudi | StrictlyOnlineBiz Nigerians It’s Time We Forget About Paid Online Surveys =-.

]]> By: Gail @ Support Small Business http://kikolani.com/google-handles-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-43515 Gail @ Support Small Business Fri, 07 May 2010 00:12:51 +0000 http://kikolani.com/?p=4928#comment-43515 Graywolf published an interesting post about <a href="http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google-treats-trusted-sites-differently-duplicate-content/">How Google Treats Duplicate Content on Trusted Sites Differently</a> back in 2008. I suspect it is still relevant today. Google's official position on <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66359">Duplicate Content Penalties</a> and the Webmaster Central Blog's <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/demystifying-duplicate-content-penalty.html">Duplicate Content Penalty</a> Myth post may shed more light on the controversy. Jill Whalen said there is <a href="http://searchengineland.com/the-duplicate-content-penalty-myth-10741">no duplicate content penalty</a> but that is a rather old (2007) post. It is easy to see there are a ton of duplicate sites indexed. Just search for a unique title or excerpt. You can see it with spam blog comments. Searches can turn up hundreds to thousands of identical comments still in the index. The question is: how long do they stay there before they are filtered out? .-= New from Gail @ Support Small Business <a href="http://www.growmap.com/smm/">Social Media Marketing Monday – SMM Overview</a> =-. Graywolf published an interesting post about How Google Treats Duplicate Content on Trusted Sites Differently back in 2008. I suspect it is still relevant today.

Google’s official position on Duplicate Content Penalties and the Webmaster Central Blog’s Duplicate Content Penalty Myth post may shed more light on the controversy.

Jill Whalen said there is no duplicate content penalty but that is a rather old (2007) post.

It is easy to see there are a ton of duplicate sites indexed. Just search for a unique title or excerpt. You can see it with spam blog comments. Searches can turn up hundreds to thousands of identical comments still in the index.

The question is: how long do they stay there before they are filtered out?
.-= New from Gail @ Support Small Business Social Media Marketing Monday – SMM Overview =-.

]]> By: LoneWolf@WWW Ramblings http://kikolani.com/google-handles-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-42286 LoneWolf@WWW Ramblings Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:45:32 +0000 http://kikolani.com/?p=4928#comment-42286 If your blog is set to ping when an article is posted then Google should have an accurate time frame to work with in determining an original. I also have the Google XML Sitemaps plugin that notifies Google, Bing and Ask.com when it is updated after content changes (it can notify Yahoo too if you have a Yahoo ID). I guess there is a difference between duplicate content that you've produced by syndicating your articles and that which is blatant plagiarism or scraping. It would be nice if Google could distinguish between the two and punish the scrapers. On that note, how do you find out if someone is scraping your articles? Is there any software that can make this easier? .-= New from LoneWolf@WWW Ramblings <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wcnickerson/ramblings/~3/8e4WOAwmHyA/">Internet Marketing Gone Wild</a> =-. If your blog is set to ping when an article is posted then Google should have an accurate time frame to work with in determining an original. I also have the Google XML Sitemaps plugin that notifies Google, Bing and Ask.com when it is updated after content changes (it can notify Yahoo too if you have a Yahoo ID).

I guess there is a difference between duplicate content that you’ve produced by syndicating your articles and that which is blatant plagiarism or scraping. It would be nice if Google could distinguish between the two and punish the scrapers.

On that note, how do you find out if someone is scraping your articles? Is there any software that can make this easier?
.-= New from LoneWolf@WWW Ramblings Internet Marketing Gone Wild =-.

]]> By: Simon@List of Search Engines http://kikolani.com/google-handles-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-42046 Simon@List of Search Engines Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:48:07 +0000 http://kikolani.com/?p=4928#comment-42046 Someone just stole one of my articles, substituting my author bio with their own links. It's not fun when that happens, and not much you can do about it when they just post it all over juicer blogs probably not worth the effort to try stopping them. The thing I hate most about it is they create a lot of duplicate content that my own articles have to compete with, it probably devalues my articles to some degree. Simon Someone just stole one of my articles, substituting my author bio with their own links.

It’s not fun when that happens, and not much you can do about it when they just post it all over juicer blogs probably not worth the effort to try stopping them.

The thing I hate most about it is they create a lot of duplicate content that my own articles have to compete with, it probably devalues my articles to some degree.

Simon

]]> By: Leo Dimilo http://kikolani.com/google-handles-duplicate-content.html/comment-page-1#comment-42012 Leo Dimilo Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:16:11 +0000 http://kikolani.com/?p=4928#comment-42012 @Duncan, Nope...it doesn't ding anything. In fact, I have actually created small mini-nets from duplicate content with absolutely no penalty at all and it has actually been more beneficial than not. Folks have duplicate content all wrong. If you really want to learn how to benefit from duplicate or syndicated content, then you have to test. This is especially for much debated topics such as this one where opinions about whether it is good or not range so wildly. Personally, I think that most just take something and run with based on "he said, she said" information...a lot of time this is to the blogger or marketer's detriment. .-= New from Leo Dimilo <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/internetmarketingtheory/~3/jm_i9VWREec/">Bowling Balls, Postcards Or Give and You Get</a> =-. @Duncan,

Nope…it doesn’t ding anything. In fact, I have actually created small mini-nets from duplicate content with absolutely no penalty at all and it has actually been more beneficial than not.

Folks have duplicate content all wrong. If you really want to learn how to benefit from duplicate or syndicated content, then you have to test. This is especially for much debated topics such as this one where opinions about whether it is good or not range so wildly.

Personally, I think that most just take something and run with based on “he said, she said” information…a lot of time this is to the blogger or marketer’s detriment.
.-= New from Leo Dimilo Bowling Balls, Postcards Or Give and You Get =-.

]]>